Maree Cassaidy, Associate at Fox and Partners, highlights several proposed employment law changes, including extending employment rights to all workers, making unfair dismissal rights available from day one, and banning exploitative zero-hour contracts. These changes could lead to increased litigation and higher costs for employers, particularly small businesses.
Cassaidy warns: “Whilst these proposals are well intended, much more needs to be done to mitigate the pressures the proposals will create for the tribunal system and smaller firms and organisations. Labour needs to provide greater clarity on what form the proposals will take – and how they will be enforced.”
Louise Haycock of Fragomen, a global immigration law firm, points out that Labour's manifesto is light on details regarding immigration policies.
She explains: “The party has pledged an overall commitment to reduce numbers and to link training to usage of visas with an obligation to upskill workers, yet it is unclear what would be put in place to achieve this.
“Joined up thinking across the Migration Advisory Committee, skills bodies and government departments is commendable but the ‘how’ is very much missing.
“The ideas and ambitions all appear long term. What is missing is the changes needed to address problems that require immediate action. Ambitions to train the UK population cannot be answer to today’s skill shortages and the growth in the economy that is required now.”
Matt Fryer, MD of Brookson Group, which provides specialist services for freelancers, contractors and the self-employed workforce, comments: “There are few surprises in the Labour Manifesto, but employers and workers in the temporary workforce will welcome the promise of a full consultation before new legislation is passed.
“Keir Starmer’s balancing act is to improve workers’ rights and protections in a way that also works for businesses. The area where this will be a particular challenge is for the flexible workforces that keep our economy going. The trick is to protect gig workers whilst avoiding unintended problems for independent contractors and freelancers who keep our hospitals and schools open, build our homes, keep our IT systems up to date and deliver engineering and infrastructure projects that keep the country moving.”
Fryer goes on: “If not properly thought through, simplification of employment status could further penalise independent contractors, while a ban on zero hours contracts could prevent businesses from accessing workers as and when they are needed. Unintended consequences could range from further worker exploitation and a return to a widespread rise in illegal tax avoidance schemes to a restriction of economic growth and gaps in frontline services.”
“Keeping everyone in the flexible workforce and its supply chain happy is no easy feat, but ensuring that businesses can access a pool of skilled workers, as and when they are needed, is essential to ensuring the health of the UK’s economy and public infrastructure.”
Balancing 'pro-worker' with 'pro-business'
Amanda Glover, Associate in the employment team at Clarkslegal LLP says: "Labour has put wealth creation at the heart of its manifesto and has sought to position itself as both pro-business and pro-worker, arguing that business-friendly policies deliver growth and decent employment, whilst worker-friendly policies deliver productivity and business success.
"The manifesto did not add any new policy commitments from an employment perspective, that were not already covered in the previously published 'Labour’s Plan to Make Work Pay: Delivering a New Deal for Working People'.
"The philosophy and direction of travel is clear and this is likely to result in one of the most radical reforms of the world of work in decades. Employers and HR have been warned they will see action around the banning of fire and rehire, the banning of exploitative zero-hours contracts, the granting of basic day-one rights such as protection against unfair dismissal, the movement towards a single status of worker, greater protections from dismissal for pregnant women, extending pay gap reporting to include ethnicity and disability, ensuring the minimum wage is a real living wage, establishing a single enforcement body for employment rights, enhanced protections for unions and the strengthening of collective bargaining.
"However, the devil will be in the detail when it comes to determining whether the changes will go far enough to protect workers whilst remaining business-friendly.
"Labour’s belief that it can be pro-business and pro-worker, whilst undoubtedly genuinely held, has an electoral advantage, enabling the party to build the broadest possible coalition of voters. However, the detail could well destabilise that coalition, which is why I do not expect it to emerge before 4 July. Unfortunately, employment practitioners will have to wait to see how the cards will fall, but this is not an excuse for failing to scenario plan around the broad tenets of policy which are widely known."
The Labour Party’s 2024 manifesto outlines ambitious plans to transform the workplace and support small businesses.
Key policies include raising the minimum wage, banning exploitative contracts, and enhancing flexible working rights.
However, experts highlight potential challenges and the need for careful implementation to avoid unintended consequences, particularly for small businesses and flexible workforces. HR leaders should prepare for significant changes in employment law and workplace practices, ensuring their organisations can adapt to and thrive under new regulations.
Reactions to the manifesto launches of the other major parties can be found here: