The main motivator for ALL employees revealed

The main motivator for ALL employees revealed

Do male and female employees really have different motivational triggers in the workplace?

A recent survey carried out by employee engagement platform Peakon, found that across both genders, people are not satisfied with their workload, the financial rewards they receive, and the recognition given for the work they do.

The report also revealed the number one motivator in the office; faith in the mission and direction of the worker's own organization – or to put it another way, strategy.

Peakon Co-Founder, Dan Rogers, spoke to Business Grapevine about why employees are so driven by their faith in the business?

Can you explain the results of the survey?

“Our data shows that employees increasingly care about the mission and vision of the company they work for.

“Looking at the drivers against which we measure engagement, job aspects such as ‘meaningful work’ are becoming more and more crucial to having a driven workforce. Throwing money at employees is nowhere near as effective as rewarding them with worthwhile experience.

“This is particularly true of millennials. Globalisation and the ubiquity of the internet means we are more conscious of our own contributions to society than ever before.

"Of course employees want to see the outcome of their work at their company, but they also want to see the effect this is having on the wider community.”

Why do you think male and female employees have differing priorities? What does this mean for a gender neutral society?

“The data from our report shows that men and women are engaged by different things at work, however it would be wrong to infer a fundamental psychological or genetic difference from this. Instead, we believe the data shows the effects of longstanding cultural and historical norms, and how workplace traditions have defined the way people from different genders behave.

“Our real-time analytics data means that employers can see how men and women differ in their office environments, implement small changes to account for this, and then assess whether these changes have had the desired effect.

"When we show our clients data for their employees, we are not prescribing that they treat men and women differently, instead we are alerting them to these differences exist and asking them how they can be eradicated.”

Read More

Worker sent home for being 'too good-looking' - as research finds 'ugly' salary premium

Workplace sexism has been a media theme of late...

HR Grapevine
HR Grapevine | Executive Grapevine International Ltd
HR Dilemma: Will the traditional office become extinct?

With the increase in demand for flexible working and...

HR Grapevine
HR Grapevine | Executive Grapevine International Ltd
Are workplace sensors a good idea?

Everyone has those lull moments at work where we escape...

HR Grapevine
HR Grapevine | Executive Grapevine International Ltd
HR on the weekend: National Drink Wine day, The Glass Menagerie and Love against hate bike ride

This week has brought a spell of warmer weather, and...

  • 11
HR Grapevine
HR Grapevine | Executive Grapevine International Ltd
HR on the weekend: Kew Gardens, Breakfast at Tiffany's & more...

Love is in the air this weekend...

HR Grapevine
HR Grapevine | Executive Grapevine International Ltd
13 ways to tell if your employees are looking for a new job

Whilst the most blindingly obvious indicator that an...

  • 96
HR Grapevine
HR Grapevine | Executive Grapevine International Ltd

Comments (1)

  • Rex
    Rex
    Sat, 19 Nov 2016 3:25am GMT
    Why shouldn't men and women have differing priorities at work? Why should employers try to eliminate differences? Male and female animals are not the same, they are designed by nature to be different and those differences are meant to compliment the other. Trying to homogenise your workforce and make them gender neutral effectively is decreasing the diversity in your company or organisation. And the rest of the world outside your company walls is not going to be receiving the same treatment, so eliminating this factor will only make your company more out of touch with how people actually are in the outside world. Far better that you have fair representatives of the make-up of the local population working for you, than going to efforts to satisfy some perceived gender inequality which will only be to the detriment of your company, and waste time and money that could be better spent elsewhere.

Guide to HR Technology

Guide to HR Technology 2016

Top Features

Register for FREE access.

* By registering you agree that you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions and that Executive Grapevine International Ltd and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content and products.
HR Grapevine Magazine Latest Issue

Magazine Features