A team can look impressive on paper - each member might be highly experienced, represent a range of functions and backgrounds, and bring considerable knowledge to the table. Yet, when the team meets, it’s the same individuals dominating the discussion, difficult questions remain unasked and decisions are constantly revisited because concerns were not raised at the right time. Or, there might be lively discussion and apparent agreement, but little shared ownership once the meeting ends. People return to their individual priorities, information remains within functions, and collective decisions are interpreted differently across the organisation.
These examples show why individual capability does not necessarily translate into team performance. High-performing teams do four things differently: they own a shared direction, make purposeful use of difference, combine psychological safety with accountability, and regularly examine how they work together.
UK
United States


