If two candidates both claim to be responsible for 10% sales growth, we'll think about the conditions they achieved that under - the sector, the market conditions at the time, the territory they covered, whether they had strong marketing support or weak support etc - and then we'll try to work out how they are likely to perform in the job we are recruiting to with the support they will have.
Exam results are just the same - to be an effective tool for predicting future performance you want to take into account the conditions that the scores were achieved under. If you two candidates have the same grades, but one had all the support money can buy and the other one didn't, it might be reasonable to expect that the one who received less support can achieve more once the right support is there for them. As with all recruitment, we have to take care not to over-interpret the limited data we have available, but this might be one of many indicators of future potential.
Wed, 2 May 2018 12:19pm BST
As a former Teacher this is really annoying. Having worked in schools on 'both sides of the track' believe me when I say that Teachers in high attaining schools do NOT have it 'easier' than those in struggling state schools (as described in the article).
The job that ALL Teachers do is vital to our country and the education of our children. Discriminating against anyone simply due to their background and schooling is incomprehensible! We're meant to be reducing this discrimination, not encouraging it!
Wed, 2 May 2018 11:50am BST
So it's fair that the person who was sent to Eton by his parents' choice is then discriminated against? Why is that any more fair than discriminating against someone with a different skin colour because of his parents?