Recruiter bad-mouths candidate for requesting higher pay

Recruiter bad-mouths candidate for requesting higher pay

Recruiters. It can often seem like you’re stuck between a rock and hard place. Trying to get clients to pay market value. Trying to mitigate against candidate’s unrealistic demands. Having to paint a picture, for everyone, about what the employment landscape actually looks like. Exhausting!

However, not everyone is as forgiving as you might be. Recruitment Grapevine managed to get hold of one hiring manager’s status update which is likely to spark divided discussion.

To continue reading FREE content

To continue reading
FREE content

For news and offers direct to your inbox and online, pop your details below.


* By registering you agree that you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions and that Executive Grapevine International Ltd and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content and products.

If you find yourself asked to register again, please make sure that your browser cookie is enabled.

We would like you to become part of HR Grapevine and join the most engaged online communities of HR Professionals in the UK. Thousands of HR Professionals just like you have already registered with HR Grapevine and we would like you to join in - its FREE!

However, an EU regulation coming our way means that to continue hearing from us, you will need to become a registered user. No matter the outcome of BREXIT, this regulation will apply to us while we remain in the UK and perhaps beyond.

Access across the HR Grapevine site will continue to be free of charge once you register. You will also be able to join our other communities for:

  • Recruiters
  • Business Leaders

Every reader we retain, is very important to us, and we would appreciate you taking the time to Register with us now.

Comments (2)

  • Richard
    Fri, 16 Feb 2018 2:04pm GMT
    In my last message I wrote CeO, I meant hiring manager. oops.
  • Richard
    Fri, 16 Feb 2018 1:55pm GMT
    Yet more evidence that privilege is invisible to the privileged. How could this CeO afford to work for 20-40 hours/week for no money at 24? The rest of us need to earn money to live, to pay for stuff. Like food, and a place to live, and transport etc.

    The CeO even says how many doors that internship opened for him/her - doors which are not being opened to those of us who simply can't afford to work without pay, because we would starve, or become homeless. This CeO feels they got to where they are through 'hard work' and 'merit', I don't doubt; as it allows them to justify to themselves the inequality in pay and power etc. They get more because they 'deserve it', they 'earned it', they are 'better'; not because they were born ahead in the race, and had opportunities and options not open to the majority of us.

    They may well be very able, and talented and hard working - but they were also privileged and started with an advantage.

    Unpaid internships are yet another way for those in power to maintain the status quo, and preserve their privilege. If a society/system/organisation claims to be in favour of social mobility, or if it claims to be a meritocracy of some form, it should not be offering unpaid internships, without income support of some form for those who pursue it (such as a universal basic income, or some other solution).

    To frame this, I come from a (very) working class background; my parents sacrificed to give me the chance to sit scholarship exams at some of the top schools in the UK. I was exceptionally smart as a child and excelled in the tests and was able to go to one of these schools on a scholarship, with the children of the privileged. I was top of my class, constantly (results were all public). I did well at school, but was unable to get into one of the privileged universities; I was told that I was smart enough but they had 'no places left for me'. I now work as an executive search consultant, for a less than average salary, recruiting academics (I am good at talking to smart people). When I look at my peers from school, at least 75% of them are already top executives at internationally recognized companies. Many of them achieved success young (almost straight away - executive management by 30 years old).

    Did they get their through merit? Partly.
    Did they work hard? I don't doubt that they did
    Are they smart enough? Yes, but not the smartEST
    Were there other factors at work? it would seem so to me.
    Am I bitter about it? not really :)