Female cabin crew member wins discrimination case

Female cabin crew member wins discrimination case

A new mother and cabin crew member has won a legal claim for sexual discrimination.

Emma Seville made her legal claim at Birmingham Employment Tribunal against the Flybe airline of Exeter.

Thank you for being a valued reader

To continue enjoying news and offers, direct to your inbox and online, pop your business email in the box below. Read more about why you need to register.

We would like you to become part of HR Grapevine and join the most engaged online communities of HR Professionals in the UK. Thousands of HR Professionals just like you have already registered with HR Grapevine and we would like you to join in - its FREE!

However, an EU regulation coming our way means that to continue hearing from us, you will need to become a registered user. No matter the outcome of BREXIT, this regulation will apply to us while we remain in the UK and perhaps beyond.

Access across the HR Grapevine site will continue to be free of charge once you register. You will also be able to join our other communities for:

  • Recruiters
  • Business Leaders and Entrepreneurs
  • Board Consulting and Executive Search

Every reader we retain, is very important to us, and we would appreciate you taking the time to Register with us now.

If you find yourself asked to register again, please make sure that your browser cookie is enabled.

I'm also interested in news for:

* By registering you agree that you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions and that Executive Grapevine International Ltd and our partners may contact you regarding relevant content and products.

Comments (2)

  • Jackie
    Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:14pm BST
    The courts recognise women are more likely to have the double burden of childcare and paid work so that is why mostly such cases are brought by women. However as a society we don't seem willing to tackle inequality in domestic arrangements and almost retain a male breadwinner model. So women add paid work to their domestic work and employers deal with it, but the male role hardly gets disturbed. Strange blindspot.
  • Greg Turner
    Greg Turner
    Wed, 7 Sep 2016 2:30pm BST
    Interesting case that highlights the inbuilt discrimination against 'fathers' more than it does discrimination against 'women'.

    In order for the sexual discrimination part to be valid you would have to show that you were at more of a disadvantage because you're a woman than if you were a man. The tribunal found that because the vast majority of the women who worked as cabin crew were of child bearing age, they were more likely to be impacted by decisions around flexible working and thus the case for sexual discrimination could be up held.

    But this only holds true if we are more likely to see mothers as the care gives than fathers. That is the only way you can claim that being a woman/mother puts you at a disadvantage to your male counterparts since your male counterparts are just as likely to experience the challenges of having to juggle child care as women/mothers are.

    It's interesting that we still have a system that fails to recognise the in built biases and prejudices against men, while being so quick to point out those against women.

Most Read

Guide to Outplacement and Career Transition

Guide to Outplacement and Career Transition 2016

Related Insights

HR Grapevine Magazine Latest Issue

Magazine Features

Read More