USA 
United Kingdom
The State Department's Head of HR, Lew Olowski, is leaving his role after overseeing 1,350 job cuts, while unions, courts, and employees question the wider staffing fallout.
Lew Olowski, who served as Chief Human Capital Officer for the Bureau of Personnel and Training, is departing for a senior post in the Office of Foreign Missions. The agency declined to comment.
Olowski directed a summer reduction in force that affected nearly 1,350 employees across the department. The agency issued more than 1,100 RIF (Reduction in Force) notices to civil service staff and nearly 250 to Foreign Service personnel based in the US.
Senior officials described the effort to Congress as the most extensive and complex workforce downsizing of its kind and said they coordinated with the Office of Personnel Management throughout the process.
Some employees who received notices were formally separated in September. The department also attempted to conclude layoff actions for nearly 250 Foreign Service officers and a smaller group of civil service employees last week. A federal judge in San Francisco halted those moves with a temporary restraining order connected to an ongoing lawsuit brought by unions before the government shutdown. The action challenged the administration’s ability to pursue wide-scale layoffs while federal funding was unresolved.
Unions challenge layoffs and raise compliance concerns
The amended lawsuit argues that multiple agencies, including the State Department, are not fully observing requirements in the stopgap funding bill that paused the administration’s layoff authority. Democracy Forward, which joined the case, said the filing also seeks to reverse “other unlawful RIF actions” at the Small Business Administration, the General Services Administration, and the departments of Education and Defense.
Workforce sentiment within the diplomatic corps has been strained as staffing cuts and rapid organizational shifts continue. A survey conducted by the American Foreign Service Association (AFSA) gathered feedback from more than 2,100 active-duty Foreign Service employees. AFSA found that 98% of respondents experienced lower morale this year, and 86% said workplace changes since January limited their ability to carry out US diplomatic priorities.
Before the changes, about 17,000 active-duty Foreign Service officers served in the department. AFSA estimates that nearly 25% of the workforce departed this year, including those affected by layoffs, retirements, and deferred resignation offers.
HR Conversational Agent: Do's & Don'ts
HR chatbots are everywhere. But answering “What’s my vacation policy?” is only the beginning.
The real value of conversational AI starts when an HR Agent can understand employee context, access the right HR knowledge, trigger requests and workflows, and connect with the systems already in place.
So how do you tell the difference between an impressive AI demo and a solution employees will actually trust and use?
In HR Conversational AI: 5 Do’s & 5 Don’ts, discover the key principles for building an HR Agent that delivers real value — and the common mistakes that can turn an AI initiative into yet another tool employees ignore.
You’ll learn how to evaluate:
Employee experience: Can employees get relevant, personalized answers?
Action: Can the Agent actually initiate HR requests and processes?
Integration: Does it work with your existing HR ecosystem?
Trust & governance: Is employee data handled securely?
Adoption: Will employees actually want to use it?
Before choosing your next HR AI solution, know what to look for — and what to avoid.
Concerns over HR leadership background
Olowski’s earlier appointment to the department’s top HR role drew scrutiny from AFSA. The group said in April it was “deeply concerned” because the role is traditionally held by career Foreign Service members with extensive experience.
It added that placing an “untenured, entry-level officer who has only served one complete overseas tour” into a position central to expertise, service, and non-partisanship raised broader concerns about how professional progression is valued within the department.
