Share this article:

'Mental delusion' | Homeland Security sued by airport worker over transgender discrimination policy

Airport security officers monitoring computer

A Virginia-based Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officer has filed a federal lawsuit accusing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of unlawful discrimination under a newly implemented screening policy.

The report on Fox News says Danielle Mittereder, a transgender woman employed at Dulles International Airport, is arguing that the TSA’s revised pat-down rules violate civil rights protections. The policy prohibits transgender officers from performing physical screenings on passengers of the same gender identity, limiting them instead by biological sex.

A TSA spokesperson confirmed the rule change, stating that “male Transportation Security Officers will conduct pat-down procedures on male passengers and female Transportation Security Officers will conduct pat-down procedures on female passengers, based on operational needs.” The policy applies regardless of an officer’s gender identity or transition status.

Policy change follows presidential order

The agency said the new rule was introduced to align with an executive order from the Trump administration titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. The order directs federal agencies to recognize only two sexes - male and female - defined by biological sex at conception.

Until February, TSA work assignments had been determined by gender identity under a 2021 management directive. Internal documents obtained by the Associated Press also indicate that transgender officers can no longer serve as official witnesses during private screening procedures.

Mittereder’s complaint alleges that the new restrictions prevent transgender officers from performing key responsibilities, advancing to higher-level roles, or earning specialized certifications. “Solely because she is transgender, TSA now prohibits plaintiff from conducting core functions of her job, impedes her advancement to higher-level positions and specialized certifications, excludes her from TSA-controlled facilities and subjects her identity to unwanted and undue scrutiny each workday,” the filing states.

Featured Resource

Delivering Consistent HR Services for Deskless Workers

Delivering Consistent HR Services for Deskless Workers

Can HR truly reach every employee — whether office-based, hybrid or deskless?

Deskless workers represent ~80% of the global workforce, yet most HR systems were designed for desk-based employees.

This ebook explores how to build a multichannel HR service delivery strategy — combining portals, mobile apps, email and conversational interfaces — to deliver consistent HR services, improve accessibility, and create a seamless employee experience across the entire workforce.

Based on research conducted by Neocase with clients and stakeholders in the industrial sector, it highlights practical insights on:

  • Why deskless environments reveal structural gaps in HR service delivery

  • Why multichannel HR requires governance, not just more channels

  • How mobile-first access can transform frontline HR interactions

 

What you will learn from this eBook: 

  • How to reach employees without desk access

  • How to structure HR service delivery across sites

  • How to reduce HR workload from employee requests

  • Real examples from large organizations

Show more
Show less

DHS defends policy amid legal challenge

Mittereder’s attorney, Jonathan Puth, called the new rules “terribly demeaning and 100% illegal,” arguing that the agency is violating established workplace protections.

A DHS spokesperson rejected claims of discrimination, saying the policy protects travelers’ comfort and safety and overtly expressing disdain for transgender people. “Does the AP want female travelers to be subjected to pat-downs by male TSA officers?” spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin wrote in a statement, adding, “What a useless and fundamentally dangerous idea, to prioritize mental delusion over the comfort and safety of American travelers.”

The case marks one of the first legal challenges to arise from the administration’s broader rollback of gender identity policies in federal employment.

Be the first to comment.

Sign up for a FREE myGrapevine account to have your say.

Share this article:

You are currently previewing this article.Create account

This is the last preview available to you for the next 30 days.

To receive our daily newsletter and access HR features & insights, create a free account today.