USA 
United Kingdom
Two former private flight attendants who served in Home Depot co-founder Arthur M. Blank's family office have filed a lawsuit alleging severe workplace exploitation.
They claim they were overworked, underpaid, and forced to compensate for unqualified coworkers who were involved in romantic relationships with management.
The lawsuit, filed in an Atlanta district court by Adele Pearson and Samantha Carlisle, details alleged practices by the Arthur M. Blank Family Office (AMBFO) that reportedly led to exhausting work hours and compromised employee wellbeing. Blank, co-founder of The Home Depot and a prominent figure in Atlanta with stakes in the NFL’s Atlanta Falcons, is at the center of the complaint.
Employment infringed on personal time
According to court documents, Pearson and Carlisle described grueling schedules, sometimes reaching 26 days of work per month, with total weekly hours around 90. Despite the long hours, they claim AMBFO still failed to pay overtime in compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), stating that their positions legally qualified for overtime compensation. The plaintiffs allege AMBFO manipulated duty records to conceal their extended hours, further violating labor protections.
Pearson joined AMBFO in 2021, serving as lead flight attendant at an annual salary that reached $175,000. She claims, however, that the demands of the position quickly overshadowed the compensation. Both women detailed a workload that extended far beyond typical inflight service, involving tasks such as menu planning, personal errands, and overseeing accommodations for the Blank family’s travel.
They described the need to perform up to five hours of preparatory work before each flight, arriving at the hangar two hours early and staying at least an hour and a half after each flight for cleaning and post-flight duties.
A significant portion of their complaint centers around “on-call” periods, during which they were required to remain within two hours of the hangar, limiting their personal time, even on supposed days off. Additionally, they allege AMBFO routinely contacted them for work-related matters during their personal time, making it nearly impossible to enjoy a true break from responsibilities.
To address the overwhelming workload, Pearson and Carlisle requested additional staff support, but the addition of two new flight attendants did not alleviate the burden, they say. The complaint alleges that one new hire was involved in a romantic relationship with Blank, and the other lacked the qualifications necessary to handle the responsibilities. Another critical figure, a Flight Operations Coordinator reportedly romantically involved with an executive, was similarly unqualified, forcing Pearson and Carlisle to handle additional tasks they say were outside their roles.
Delivering Consistent HR Services for Deskless Workers
Can HR truly reach every employee — whether office-based, hybrid or deskless?
Deskless workers represent ~80% of the global workforce, yet most HR systems were designed for desk-based employees.
This ebook explores how to build a multichannel HR service delivery strategy — combining portals, mobile apps, email and conversational interfaces — to deliver consistent HR services, improve accessibility, and create a seamless employee experience across the entire workforce.
Based on research conducted by Neocase with clients and stakeholders in the industrial sector, it highlights practical insights on:
Why deskless environments reveal structural gaps in HR service delivery
Why multichannel HR requires governance, not just more channels
How mobile-first access can transform frontline HR interactions
What you will learn from this eBook:
How to reach employees without desk access
How to structure HR service delivery across sites
How to reduce HR workload from employee requests
Real examples from large organizations
The complaint argues that AMBFO’s actions constitute unfair practices that disregarded employee wellbeing, reflecting a broader issue of workplace exploitation that can arise when employers prioritize convenience over staff rights. The lawsuit seeks compensation for unpaid overtime and other damages under the FLSA.
Safeguards from worker exploitation
Their claim highlights the importance of safeguards to protect employees from similar exploitation. Workplace guidelines and accessible complaint procedures are essential to prevent unfair practices and to uphold the rights and wellbeing of employees, ensuring companies maintain ethical standards even in high-demand environments. AMBFO has not yet issued a response to the lawsuit.
The case raises questions about workplace fairness and transparency, particularly when high-profile employers use private resources.
It encourages a debate around the need for greater accountability in family-run businesses and for comprehensive regulations to ensure provision of employee rights in such cirumstances.
