Women missing out on FTSE board roles due to selection processes
Published: by
by

The appointment of women to FTSE 350-listed non-executive director roles is being held back by flawed selection processes, new research suggests.

A report released by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) and produced by Cranfield School of Management, suggests that current selection processes favour candidates with similar characteristics to existing male-dominated board members.

Search firms have introduced a voluntary code of conduct and had some success at getting more women on long lists. But when it comes to shortlisting and appointing, the candidates who are selected tend to be those who are perceived as “fitting in” with the values, norms and behaviours of existing board members, who are largely men.

The study involved interviews with senior consultants at ten leading executive search firms in London, following the recent Davies Review which called upon executive search firms to take on a more active role in increasing gender diversity on FTSE boards.

Baroness Prosser, Deputy Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, says: “Research shows that diverse boards produce better performance. Many companies recognise this and we commissioned this report to support their efforts to improve the representation of women at board level.

“However, the often subjective way appointments are made ends up replicating existing boards rather than bringing in the talented women who could bring real benefit to individual company performance and ultimately help Britain’s economic recovery.”

Dr Elena Doldor, Senior Research Fellow from the Cranfield International Centre for Women Leaders, says: “Our research shows that ESFs are more willing to play a part in increasing board diversity and we identified a number of good practices in the sector.

“We noticed that search firms tend to focus their diversity initiatives on the first stages of the appointment process. In the later stages of the process, which entails short listing and interviewing, there needs to be more effort from headhunters and chairmen to ensure that selection practices remain inclusive.” 

Karen Gill, co-founder of everywoman, adds: "Executive search firms have made progress thanks to the voluntary code, but the push needs to continue and headhunters must drive the focus on competencies rather than this indefinable and dangerous notion of “fit”.

"It’s easy to hire the image of what you know so chairman must make a conscious decision to take the blinkers off and consider applicants on a proven track record. This will be a leap of faith for many but British boards don’t need more of the same; they need women with the right competencies and a different perspective to bring to the table."

|Comments (1)| Comment
Tue, 29 May 2012 11:02am BST
susanne hoeck
Where will I find the report released by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC)? Is it possible to download results for distribution in Danish Business Magazine?
+ Read more...
- Show less
Related Stories
Louis Vuitton close to achieving 40% executive diversity target
Louis Vuitton close to achieving 40% executive diversity target
French luxury goods giant LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton has revealed that it is on course to hit its target of women making up 40% of its executives - as it launched the search for the UK's Veuve Clicquot Business Woman Award 2015... read more ›
UK lags behind Germany despite record number of women in work
UK lags behind Germany despite record number of women in work
Record numbers of women are now in the British workforce following an increase of nearly 800,000 over the last four years, new figures have revealed... read more ›
'Board not to blame' for lack of women in top jobs says Royal Mail's CEO
'Board not to blame' for lack of women in executive positions, says Royal Mail's CEO Moya Greene
Boards cannot be blamed for the lack of women CEOs and executive teams need to take more responsibility for making sure there are credible female candidates in the pipeline... read more ›
Freezing eggs is 'cynical' and a bonus too far says, executive search firm
Freezing eggs is 'cynical' and a bonus too far says, executive search firm
Paying for women employees to freeze their eggs is a “cynical” way for companies to “exert greater control over their female staff members”, according to a senior search consultant... read more ›
Half of women consider not having children due to career risk
Half of women consider not having children due to career risk
Half of working women are so concerned by the risk having a baby would pose on their career they would consider remaining childless... read more ›
'Disabled workers not worth minimum wage to employers,' claims minister
'Disabled workers not worth minimum wage to employers,' claims minister
A political storm erupted yesterday when it emerged that the UK’s Welfare Minister, Lord Freud, claimed that some people with disabilities are not “worth” the minimum wage... read more ›
Remuneration rules acting as ‘restraining hand’ on boardroom bonuses
Remuneration rules acting as 'restraining hand' on boardroom bonuses says EY
New government regulations are acting as a ‘restraining hand’ on boardroom pay and bonuses according to a new report... read more ›
Fathers earn significantly more than men without children
Fathers earn significantly more than men without children
It may be better for men to start their own family as fathers made 40% more than childless men in 2010, according to research from The Graduate Center... read more ›
HR Grapevine Magazine Latest Edition